Conscientiousness · Facet C4
Achievement-Striving is the part of your temperament that sets the height of your own bar. Not what you are able to do, but how much you want the next result to beat the last. High scorers reach a goal and are already past it. Low scorers decide what counts as enough and live there.
Free, no sign-up, results right away
Achievement-Striving measures how high you set your own bar and how soon you want to lift it again. The statements ask about aiming for excellence, choosing goals that ask more of you, and whether arriving at one leaves you content or restless. This is the appetite for more, not the tally on paper.
The facet belongs to Conscientiousness, the domain of goals, order and dependability, and sits near its centre: against the total score it reaches 0.79, behind Self-Discipline alone. Wanting a larger result is one disposition, delivering it week by week is another, and the two come apart often.
Across 135,947 profiles the mean here is 37.6 out of 50, third highest of the six facets in this family and almost seven points above Self-Discipline. Ambition is easier to admit to than a timetable. A raw 38 therefore sits mid-crowd, and the upper tenth opens only at 45.
In research the scale usually keeps the name Achievement Striving, and the older tradition of achievement motivation covers much of the same ground. The items are the public domain IPIP versions published by Johnson.
Ambition picks up second-hand meanings faster than almost any trait here. Three of them get read into a high score, and none is what the scale measured.
Research splits perfectionism in two: reaching towards demanding standards, and dread of falling short of them. This scale captures the first half only. The second belongs over in Neuroticism, and the pair barely moves together in our data, with Achievement-Striving at minus 0.19 against Anxiety. A high bar does not come with fear attached.
Nothing on the scale asks how many hours you put in. Long hours grow out of a job or a manager at least as often as out of character, and compulsive overwork is something a clinician would read differently again. Ambition here goes with pace, not duration: its strongest tie beyond the domain is Activity Level at 0.58.
These two form the tightest pair inside Conscientiousness at 0.70, third tightest of all 435 facet pairs in our data, so they get talked about as one trait. They are not one. This facet asks how high you aim, Self-Discipline asks whether the job carries on once nothing about it is interesting.
One end buys distance covered and pays in satisfaction. The other keeps the satisfaction and pays in reach.
You set targets slightly beyond reach, and once you are standing on one it turns into the new floor. The people near you get used to your version of enough being higher than theirs. The bill lands in the pause: arriving is good for roughly a day, and covered ground stops counting almost at once.
The bar keeps rising on its own. Reaching a goal satisfies you for about a day, then the next one appears, and resting starts to feel like losing time. Fuel, with a tax.
You work out what a good enough result looks like and stop arguing with it, which frees the hours other people spend chasing the next increment. Ordinary life gets your attention while it is happening. The cost turns up over decades: capacity you never needed goes unused.
You know the word enough. Life for you is bigger than ladders, and you would rather live well today than optimize forever for a title.
The middle band holds four profiles in ten, roughly 34 to 41 points for men and 36 to 42 for women. Ambition there switches on when it is wanted: a goal that matters gets a proper push, one that does not gets an honest shrug.
Low, average and high follow the 30/40/30 percentile convention used by Johnson, not a threshold for success. A high score says where your own bar sits, not what you have achieved, and a low one is not a shortfall to be corrected.
The raw total is what ten answers add up to, each worth 1 to 5. The curve below is drawn from 135,947 completed profiles of the 300 item version.
| Percentile | Raw score |
|---|---|
| 10 | 29 |
| 25 | 34 |
| 50 | 39 |
| 75 | 43 |
| 90 | 47 |
The median is 37 for men and 38 for women, and the middle half of each group falls between 32 and 42 and between 34 and 43. The scale stands high, so an ordinary looking 38 is exactly average rather than strong. Percentiles compare you with test takers of your own sex and age, not with everyone alive.
Two group differences show up in the data, and only one of them carries weight.
Women average 38.2 points and men 37.1, just over a point apart and the ninth smallest sex gap of the thirty facets. Age does more: men rise from 35.3 under 21 to 39.8 past 60, women from 36.9 to 40.3. Only about 250 people of each sex sit in the oldest band, so read that end as a hint.
This facet is bound to the domain score more closely than any sibling but Self-Discipline. The charts set it beside the other five and show the company it keeps outside the family. One entry is worth a second look: Activity Level, over in Extraversion, has no closer partner anywhere in the model.
At work this facet decides what you volunteer for. High scorers reach for the assignment one size larger than the last one, and a target that was met and never replaced does not stay unnoticed for long. The cost is a ceiling that keeps moving: you can deliver for a decade without feeling ahead. Low scorers hold the shape of a job and defend that edge, at the price of being passed over now and then.
At home ambition shows up as where the attention goes. High scorers bring a drive a partner can admire from across the room and resent from beside them. Low scorers are easier to plan an ordinary Saturday with, and a partner who reads care as forward motion can mistake that for coldness.
For growth the question worth asking is not how much ambition you hold but what it points at. At the high end the trait supplies the push and almost never the audit, so a target inherited at twenty can still be running at forty unchecked. At the low end a shift arrives, if at all, through one thing that turned out to be worth reaching for.
On the usual reading of twin research about half of the variation on traits like this one is inherited, and most of the rest traces to experience that even people raised in one house do not have in common. What stays put is the order of rank: the demanding twenty year old is still likely to be demanding at fifty.
Our norms show the level lifting by about four points between the youngest and oldest bands, and all six facets of Conscientiousness move that way. These are separate people compared at separate ages, so the slope is a tendency and not a timetable. Ambition also changes shape without changing size: its object at fifty is rarely its object at twenty.
A high bar above high Self-Discipline is a different life from the same bar above a low one, and the second pairing is where the frustration collects. Reading one score against the other is what the paid analysis does.
Free, no sign-up, results right away
The long version puts 10 statements behind this facet and the short one 4. Each answer counts 1 to 5, reverse worded items are turned around, and the sum is read against the norm table for your sex and age band. The scale takes that cut well: alpha slips only from 0.84 to 0.80, the sixth smallest loss of the thirty facets.
Alpha shows how closely the statements of one scale agree with each other. In research, 0.70 and above is usually treated as solid. We counted these numbers on Johnson’s open data, so they can be checked against the published values.
None of the ten statements is quoted here. People answer differently once they have read the wording in advance, so the items appear only after the test is running.
300 questions · about 35 minutes
Take the full test120 questions · about 15 minutes
Take the short versionFree, no sign-up, results right away
Drag the marker to where you believe you stand against other people, then take the test. The estimate is usually pulled around by whatever you are chasing right now.
0 means lower than almost everyone who took the test, 100 means higher than almost everyone.
This is a guess, not a measurement. The test compares your answers with norms from real people.
One sets the height of the bar, the other decides whether work carries on after it stops being interesting. They correlate 0.70, the tightest pair inside Conscientiousness. Where they part, a high bar above little staying power produces the harshest self-criticism, and that judgement is rarely fair.
No, that is the middle. The whole scale stands high in our sample: the median is 37 for men and 38 for women, and the upper tenth opens only at 45 or 46. Raw points mean nothing until they are read against the norm table for your sex and age.
Not on this scale. Achievement-Striving and Excitement-Seeking correlate 0.006 in our data, about as near to no relationship as anything in the model gets: of all 435 pairs of facets only seven sit closer to zero. Wanting a bigger result and wanting a bigger thrill are separate appetites.
No. The statements set you against your own earlier result rather than against other people, and rivalry is not what they ask about. Someone can lift their own bar every year while staying indifferent to where anybody else stands, and someone else can be fiercely competitive inside a bar that never moves.
Levels creep upward across adulthood for most people, so nothing here is fixed, though the shift is counted in years rather than weeks. Behaviour is quicker than disposition: a rival, a due date or a visible ladder changes what you reach for this quarter without moving where you sit on the scale.
We measured alpha at 0.84 for the ten statement version and 0.80 for the four statement one, both on the open data published by Johnson. The gap between them is the sixth smallest of the thirty facets, so this is one of the few scales the short test barely blunts.
Ten statements behind this scale in the long version, four in the short one, and all thirty facets either way. Both are free, and your percentile lands with the rest of the profile.
Free, no sign-up, results right away